In which one of the following cases, a constitution bench of the Supreme Court had made it clear that…
Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar is the Constitution Bench authority. It upheld section 124A through a restricted interpretation tying criminality to incitement to…
Choose your answer
In which one of the following cases, a constitution bench of the Supreme Court had made it clear that allegedly seditious speech and expression may be punished only if the speech is an 'incitement' to 'violence', or 'public disorder.'?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar is the Constitution Bench authority. It upheld section 124A through a restricted interpretation tying criminality to incitement to violence or an intention or tendency to create public disorder. Mere strong criticism of government was therefore distinguished from the conduct that fell within that construction of sedition.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision