Site navigation

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that the rule of prudence requires that…

In "Francis Stanly v. Intelligence Officer, (2007)" the Supreme Court reiterated the rule of prudence that the evidence of an accomplice should ordinarily be corroborated by…

Choose your answer

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that the rule of prudence requires that the evidence of an accomplice should ordinarily be corroborated by some other evidence:

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer A

In "Francis Stanly v. Intelligence Officer, (2007)" the Supreme Court reiterated the rule of prudence that the evidence of an accomplice should ordinarily be corroborated by other evidence.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic