In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that an application under section 311…
In "Manju Devi v. State of Rajasthan, (2019)." the Supreme Court held that a Section 311 CrPC (now Section 348 BNSS) application to recall a witness could not be rejected…
Choose your answer
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that an application under section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) could not be rejected on the sole ground that the case had been pending for an inordinate amount of time, in that case, for ten years?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
In "Manju Devi v. State of Rajasthan, (2019)." the Supreme Court held that a Section 311 CrPC (now Section 348 BNSS) application to recall a witness could not be rejected merely because the case had been pending for a long time.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision