Site navigation

In which of the following case the Supreme Court of India has explained the point of difference between…

In Ram Bihari Yadav v. State of Bihar, (1998) 4 SCC 517, the Supreme Court explained that relevance is a broader concept determining what facts a court may consider under…

Choose your answer

In which of the following case the Supreme Court of India has explained the point of difference between relevance of evidence and its admissibility?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer A

In Ram Bihari Yadav v. State of Bihar, (1998) 4 SCC 517, the Supreme Court explained that relevance is a broader concept determining what facts a court may consider under the Evidence Act, while admissibility depends on further conditions such as proof and legal permissibility of a particular piece of evidence.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic