Site navigation

In which decision did the Supreme Court hold that a trial witness could be examined by video conference…

In State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003), the Supreme Court held that a trial witness could give evidence by video conference under the then-applicable Code of…

Choose your answer

In which decision did the Supreme Court hold that a trial witness could be examined by video conference under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer C

In State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003), the Supreme Court held that a trial witness could give evidence by video conference under the then-applicable Code of Criminal Procedure, subject to safeguards. Remote argument in an appeal is a different issue.

Option feedback

Option A

The appeals in Rohtas were heard by video conference, but that case did not lay down the rule about taking trial testimony remotely.

Option B

Chandrappa sets out principles for appeals against acquittal.

Option C

Praful B. Desai held that video conferencing could satisfy the presence requirement for recording testimony, with appropriate safeguards.

Option D

Ram Swaroop concerns the evidence supporting convictions after a fatal assault.

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic