Site navigation

In which 2005 House of Lords decision was a claimant in an English libel action permitted to give…

In Polanski v Condé Nast Publications Ltd [2005] UKHL 10, the House of Lords restored the order allowing the claimant to give evidence from France by video link in his…

Choose your answer

In which 2005 House of Lords decision was a claimant in an English libel action permitted to give evidence from France by video link?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer D

In Polanski v Condé Nast Publications Ltd [2005] UKHL 10, the House of Lords restored the order allowing the claimant to give evidence from France by video link in his English libel action. This identifies a historical English decision, not a universal entitlement to video evidence.

Option feedback

Option A

Daly [2001] UKHL 26 concerned prison cell searches and confidential legal correspondence, rather than this 2005 libel video-link order.

Option B

Campbell [2004] UKHL 22 concerned publication of private information, rather than this video-link order.

Option C

A [2004] UKHL 56 concerned detention of suspected international terrorists, rather than the libel video-link order.

Option D

Polanski [2005] UKHL 10 restored permission to give evidence from France by video link in the English libel action.

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic