In the case of Mr. Y v State of Rajasthan (2022) the Supreme Court held that:
A bail order must give reasons showing that the court has applied its mind to the relevant facts and considerations. In Y v State of Rajasthan, the Supreme Court found the…
Choose your answer
In the case of Mr. Y v State of Rajasthan (2022) the Supreme Court held that:
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
A bail order must give reasons showing that the court has applied its mind to the relevant facts and considerations. In Y v State of Rajasthan, the Supreme Court found the High Court's generic observations insufficient to explain its grant of bail. This does not require a full trial-like examination of evidence, but judicial discretion must be exercised with reasons.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Gujarat Legal Superintendent
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision