Site navigation

In State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai, 2003 SC the Supreme Court of India held :

In State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003), the Supreme Court held that evidence may be recorded by video-conferencing where the accused can see and cross-examine…

Choose your answer

In State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai, 2003 SC the Supreme Court of India held :

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer D

In State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003), the Supreme Court held that evidence may be recorded by video-conferencing where the accused can see and cross-examine the witness, so the holding is "Recording of evidence through Video-conferencing so long the accused and/or his pleader are present while recording is as per "procedure established by law" and hence valid".

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic