In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, 2018 INSC 790 the Supreme Court held:
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India held that section 377 could not criminalise consensual private sexual activity between adults merely because of their gender or sexual…
Choose your answer
In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, 2018 INSC 790 the Supreme Court held:
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India held that section 377 could not criminalise consensual private sexual activity between adults merely because of their gender or sexual orientation. The ruling protected adult autonomy, dignity and privacy. It did not legalise sexual activity with minors or establish a right to same-sex marriage.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision