Site navigation

In Karan @ Fateya v. State of M.P., 2023 INSC 197, a three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that:

A claim of juvenility may be raised at any stage, including before the Supreme Court and even after the case has been finally disposed of. Karan @ Fatiya also explains that…

Choose your answer

In Karan @ Fateya v. State of M.P., 2023 INSC 197, a three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that:

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer D

A claim of juvenility may be raised at any stage, including before the Supreme Court and even after the case has been finally disposed of. Karan @ Fatiya also explains that later recognition of juvenility does not automatically invalidate the conviction: the sentencing consequences must comply with the Juvenile Justice Act. In that case, the Court upheld the conviction but set aside the sentence. Both propositions about raising the claim and preserving the conviction are therefore correct.

Practice for these exams

  • Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic