Site navigation

In Joshi Purshottam Jethanand v State of Kutch (1954), the police officer withheld a villager’s travel…

In Joshi Purshottam Jethanand the Supreme Court held that fear of injury could arise from the implied threat of prosecution or from the wrongful withholding of the…

Choose your answer

In Joshi Purshottam Jethanand v State of Kutch (1954), the police officer withheld a villager’s travel document and obtained Rs 800 for its return. What did the Supreme Court decide about the extortion conviction on the facts accepted by the lower courts?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer A

In Joshi Purshottam Jethanand the Supreme Court held that fear of injury could arise from the implied threat of prosecution or from the wrongful withholding of the villager's genuine travel document; finding no reason to interfere, "It upheld the conviction for extortion and dismissed the appeal". The outcomes "It acquitted the officer because withholding a travel document could not involve fear of injury", "It held that only a civil debt was established" and "It left the extortion conviction undecided and remanded that issue" do not describe the decision.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic