In Inder Mohan Goswami v State of Uttaranchal (2007), the Supreme Court stated that non-bailable…
The three illustrations concern likely nonappearance, inability to find the person to serve a summons, and an immediate risk of harm. Inability to serve a warrant is absent…
Choose your answer
In Inder Mohan Goswami v State of Uttaranchal (2007), the Supreme Court stated that non-bailable warrants should be issued when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result. Which alternative is NOT one of the three illustrative circumstances expressly listed in that discussion?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
The three illustrations concern likely nonappearance, inability to find the person to serve a summons, and an immediate risk of harm. Inability to serve a warrant is absent from that particular list, which is illustrative rather than exhaustive.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
AILET PG
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision