In Hansa Singh v State of Punjab (1976), the Supreme Court accepted that the accused lost self-control…
In Hansa Singh the Supreme Court accepted that the accused lost self-control on seeing the deceased sexually assault his son, so Exception 1 to IPC s.300 (grave and sudden…
Choose your answer
In Hansa Singh v State of Punjab (1976), the Supreme Court accepted that the accused lost self-control on seeing the deceased sexually assault his son. To which offence did the Court alter the murder conviction?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
In Hansa Singh the Supreme Court accepted that the accused lost self-control on seeing the deceased sexually assault his son, so Exception 1 to IPC s.300 (grave and sudden provocation) applied. The conviction was altered from s.302 to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under s.304 Part II, and the sentence was reduced to the period already undergone. The killing was not treated as mere grievous hurt or as a negligent act.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision