Site navigation

In Bhagat Ram v. State of Punjab (Punjab and Haryana High Court, 28 May 1982), a prosecution-listed…

The proviso to section 162(1) lets the accused, and with the court's permission the prosecution, use a police statement to contradict "any witness for the prosecution".…

Choose your answer

In Bhagat Ram v. State of Punjab (Punjab and Haryana High Court, 28 May 1982), a prosecution-listed witness was given up and then examined as defence witness DW4. Could the prosecutor contradict that defence witness using the witness’s investigative police statement under CrPC section 161?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer B

The proviso to section 162(1) lets the accused, and with the court's permission the prosecution, use a police statement to contradict "any witness for the prosecution". Bhagat Ram held that a witness given up by the prosecution and examined for the defence is not such a witness, so the prosecutor could not contradict him with his section 161 statement; earlier listing and the Magistrate's permission did not change this. CrPC ss.161 and 162 are now sections 180 and 181 of the BNSS.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic