In Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri v. State of Gujarat (2014), what did the Supreme Court do in the…
The Supreme Court set aside the convictions and acquitted the appellants. It found serious failures in the prosecution case. The charge labels do not describe the Court’s…
Choose your answer
In Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri v. State of Gujarat (2014), what did the Supreme Court do in the Akshardham attack prosecution?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
The Supreme Court set aside the convictions and acquitted the appellants.
It found serious failures in the prosecution case. The charge labels do not describe the Court’s ultimate disposition.
Option feedback
Option A
The Court decided the appeals rather than merely directing an investigation timetable.
Option B
It found that the prosecution failed to prove its case and set aside the convictions and sentences.
Option C
The Supreme Court reversed the convictions and did not affirm the capital sentences.
Option D
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants rather than affirming the charged offences.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Himachal Pradesh Judicial Services
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision