Site navigation

In Abhinandan Jha v. Dinesh Mishra (1967), was the Magistrate bound to accept the police conclusion…

In Abhinandan Jha v. Dinesh Mishra the Supreme Court held that a Magistrate is not bound by a police final report: he may order further investigation, take cognizance on the…

Choose your answer

In Abhinandan Jha v. Dinesh Mishra (1967), was the Magistrate bound to accept the police conclusion that no case was made out?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer B

In Abhinandan Jha v. Dinesh Mishra the Supreme Court held that a Magistrate is not bound by a police final report: he may order further investigation, take cognizance on the material, or proceed on a complaint. What he cannot do is compel the police to submit a charge-sheet, since forming the opinion under section 173 CrPC (now section 193 of the BNSS) is the investigating officer's function; a protest petition is not a precondition for disagreeing.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic