How is the maxim falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus treated in Indian evidence law?
In Ugar Ahir v State of Bihar (1965) the Supreme Court held that falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus "is neither a sound rule of law nor a rule of practice" in India. The Court…
Choose your answer
How is the maxim falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus treated in Indian evidence law?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer D
In Ugar Ahir v State of Bihar (1965) the Supreme Court held that falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus "is neither a sound rule of law nor a rule of practice" in India. The Court must separate the truth from the falsehood in a witness's evidence and accept what is reliable, though it cannot reconstruct an entirely new case where truth and falsehood are inseparable.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision