How did the Supreme Court in Dadu alias Tulsidas v. State of Maharashtra (2000) distinguish parole from…
Dadu explains that parole is a conditional, temporary release of a convict who remains under sentence; unlike suspension of sentence, it does not stop the sentence from…
Choose your answer
How did the Supreme Court in Dadu alias Tulsidas v. State of Maharashtra (2000) distinguish parole from suspension of a convict’s sentence?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
Dadu explains that parole is a conditional, temporary release of a convict who remains under sentence; unlike suspension of sentence, it does not stop the sentence from running. Parole does not remit or commute the sentence, and its grant and conditions are governed by the applicable rules.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision