a. The presumption under Section 116 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 can be rebutted by DNA…
Following Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik v. Lata, decided on the presumption of legitimacy now contained in section 116 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (formerly section…
Choose your answer
a. The presumption under Section 116 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 can be rebutted by DNA Test.
b. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus is a rule of law.
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
Following Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik v. Lata, decided on the presumption of legitimacy now contained in section 116 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (formerly section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872), the presumption can be rebutted by DNA test evidence, making the first statement correct; but Indian courts have held that 'falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus' is not a rule of law in India, making the second statement incorrect.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision