A sells to B, by deed, "my house in Kolkata". A had no house in Kolkata, but he had a house at Howrah,…
Section 98 allows evidence to show that plain language was used in a peculiar sense when it is unmeaning in reference to existing facts. The illustration to section 98 says…
Choose your answer
A sells to B, by deed, "my house in Kolkata". A had no house in Kolkata, but he had a house at Howrah, of which B had been in possession since the deed was executed. May these facts be proved?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
Section 98 allows evidence to show that plain language was used in a peculiar sense when it is unmeaning in reference to existing facts. The illustration to section 98 says that, as A had no house in Kolkata but had one at Howrah possessed by B, these facts may be proved, so the answer is "Yes, to show that the deed related to the house at Howrah". This differs from section 97, where the words fit an existing property exactly.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision