A qualified handwriting expert gives a well-reasoned opinion in court. How may the court assess that opinion?
Question and options
A qualified handwriting expert gives a well-reasoned opinion in court. How may the court assess that opinion?
Reject it in the absence of corroboration.
Exclude it as an opinion on handwriting.
Accept it as binding on the facts.
Accept it after scrutinizing its reasoning.
Answer and explanation
Section 39(1) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 makes qualified handwriting opinion relevant. The court evaluates its reasons and the rest of the evidence. Corroboration may be prudent but is not invariably required.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Madhya Pradesh Judicial Services
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Opinions of third persons (experts)
- Which BSA section provides for the relevance of expert opinions?
- How should a court treat the opinion of a properly qualified expert on a matter covered by section 39(1) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
- How does Section 39(1) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 treat suitably skilled opinions on handwriting, fingerprints and ballistics?
- Under which Section of the BSA, D.N.A. test can admitted in Evidence?
- Which statement correctly describes the BSA routes for assessing disputed handwriting against genuine handwriting?