Which of the following is/are cases NOT pertaining to dishonour of cheque under the Negotiable…

Modi Cements Ltd. v. Kuchil Kumar Nandi (1998) held that Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies even where the drawer stops payment; Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (2014) dealt with territorial jurisdiction for Section 138 complaints; and G.J. Raja v. Tejraj Surana (2019) held that interim compensation under Section 143A is prospective. Indian Overseas Bank v. Industrial Chain Concern (1990), by contrast, concerns a bank's liability as pledgee for goods pledged to it, not dishonour of a cheque, so the answer is "(B) only.".