When law makes out a contract for parties although no contract might have been made by the parties, such a contract is termed as
Question and options
When law makes out a contract for parties although no contract might have been made by the parties, such a contract is termed as
- contract of frustration
- quasi-contract
- unenforceable agreement
- contract by obligation
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B - quasi-contract
Where the law imposes obligations resembling those of a contract although the parties made no agreement, the relation is a quasi-contract; sections 68 to 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 deal with such 'certain relations resembling those created by contract'. An unenforceable agreement is one the parties did make but the law will not enforce, so it is not a contract created by law.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUSAT CAT LLM
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Quasi-contracts
- Without making a contract, a supplier lawfully delivers goods for a business, intending to be paid. The business voluntarily uses the goods. What kind of…
- A minor having lost his parents, is maintained by his neighbour. Whether the neighbour can seek recovery of expenses?
- Under section 71 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a person finds goods belonging to someone else and takes them into custody. Whose responsibilities does the…
- Quasi-contracts are the situations where
- Which one of the following conditions must be satisfied for making claim under 'necessaries' supplied to a person who is incapable of contracting