Union of India v. Maddala Thathiah illustrates a tender in the form of which kind of offer?
The Supreme Court treated the tender as a standing offer: individual requisitions for definite supplies constituted acceptance. The railway could cancel contemplated…
Choose your answer
Union of India v. Maddala Thathiah illustrates a tender in the form of which kind of offer?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
The Supreme Court treated the tender as a standing offer: individual requisitions for definite supplies constituted acceptance. The railway could cancel contemplated supplies not yet ordered, but the cancellation clause did not extinguish binding obligations arising from orders already placed.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Jharkhand Judicial Services
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision