The case of Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose: I. Is the decision of supreme court of India regarding…
Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose was decided by the Privy Council, not the Supreme Court of India, and it held that a minor's agreement is void ab initio and cannot be…
Choose your answer
The case of Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose:
I. Is the decision of supreme court of India regarding extraordinary contracts
II. Has laid down that in India a minor's contract is void ab initio
III. Has laid down that a minor's contract becomes valid when he attains majority
Which of the above statement(s) is/are correct?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer D
Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose was decided by the Privy Council, not the Supreme Court of India, and it held that a minor's agreement is void ab initio and cannot be validated on his attaining majority, so the answer is "II alone".
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
AILET PG
-
University of Delhi LL.M.
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision