Match the propositions in List I with the related cases in List II and select the correct answers using…
Harvey v. Facey held that a statement of price is not an offer, Khwaja Muhammad Khan v. Husaini Begum is an exception to privity of contract, Felthouse v. Bindley requires…
Choose your answer
Match the propositions in List I with the related cases in List II and select the correct answers using the codes given below:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| (a) Statement of price is not an offer | 1. Khwaja Muhammad Khan v. Husaini Begum |
| (b) Exception to Privity of Contract | 2. Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose |
| (c) Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror | 3. Harvey v. Facey |
| (d) No Estoppel against a minor | 4. Felthouse v. Bindley |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
Harvey v. Facey held that a statement of price is not an offer, Khwaja Muhammad Khan v. Husaini Begum is an exception to privity of contract, Felthouse v. Bindley requires acceptance to be communicated to the offeror, and Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose held there is no estoppel against a minor, giving "(a)-3,(b)-1,(c)-4,(d)-2".
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
University of Delhi LL.M.
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision