Site navigation

Match the following (a) Fisher vs. Bell (i) Privity of contract (b) Harvey vs. Facey (ii) Minor…

Fisher v Bell held a shop display is only an invitation to treat, Harvey v Facey that a mere quotation of price is not an offer, Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose that a…

Choose your answer

Match the following

(a) Fisher vs. Bell(i) Privity of contract
(b) Harvey vs. Facey(ii) Minor contract is void
(c) Mohori Bibee vs. Dharmodas Ghose(iii) Invitation to treat
(d) Dunlop Tyre vs. Selfridge and Co.(iv) Quotation of prices
Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer A

Fisher v Bell held a shop display is only an invitation to treat, Harvey v Facey that a mere quotation of price is not an offer, Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose that a minor's agreement is void, and Dunlop v Selfridge established privity of contract. The matching is therefore "(a)-(iii), (b)-(iv), (c)-(ii), (d)-(i)".

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic