Match List - I with List - II (the Companies Act means the Companies Act, 1956) and select the correct…
The Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Kappas Utpadak Panan Mahasabha case illustrates a proposal, Grainger and Son v. Gough an invitation to make an offer, Powell v. Lee…
Choose your answer
Match List - I with List - II (the Companies Act means the Companies Act, 1956) and select the correct answer using the codes given below :
| List - I | List - II |
|---|---|
| a. Proposal | i. Grainger & Son V. Gough |
| b. Invitation to make an offer | ii. Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Kappas Utpadak Panan Mahasabha Ltd. v. Manga Bhaga Chaudhary |
| c. Communication of acceptance of offer by acceptor himself | iii. Henthorn v. Fraser |
| d. Revocation of offer | iv. Powell v. Lee |
Choose the answer corresponding to the order (a) (b) (c) (d)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
The Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Kappas Utpadak Panan Mahasabha case illustrates a proposal, Grainger and Son v. Gough an invitation to make an offer, Powell v. Lee communication of acceptance by the acceptor himself, and Henthorn v. Fraser revocation of an offer, giving "ii i iv iii".
Practice for these exams
-
UGC NET Law
See pack details on LawMint.net -
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision