Site navigation

Match List I with List II LIST ILIST II A. Salomon v. Salomon I. Doctrine of Indoor Management B. Lee…

Salomon v. Salomon (1897) established separate corporate personality, the foundation for lifting of the corporate veil; Lee v. Neuchatel Asphalte (1889) held that a company…

Choose your answer

Match List I with List II

LIST ILIST II
A. Salomon v. SalomonI. Doctrine of Indoor Management
B. Lee v. Neuchatel AsphaltII. Reserve Fund
C. Royal British Bank v. TurquandIII. Majority Rights
D. Foss v. HarbottleIV. Lifting of Corporate Veil
Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer C

Salomon v. Salomon (1897) established separate corporate personality, the foundation for lifting of the corporate veil; Lee v. Neuchatel Asphalte (1889) held that a company need not set aside a reserve fund or make good lost capital before paying dividends; Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856) laid down the doctrine of indoor management; and Foss v. Harbottle (1843) the majority rule, so the correct matching is "A-IV, B-II, C-I, D-III".

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic