Site navigation

Match List I with List II. List IList II a. Lapse of offer i. Weeks v. Tybald b. General offer ii.…

Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, communication of a proposal is illustrated by Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Datt (c-iv), where the plaintiff acted without knowledge of the…

Choose your answer

Match List I with List II.

List IList II
a. Lapse of offeri. Weeks v. Tybald
b. General offerii. Henthorn v. Fraser
c. Communication of proposaliii. Coffee Board v. CCT
d. Implied proposaliv. Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Datt

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer C

Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, communication of a proposal is illustrated by Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Datt (c-iv), where the plaintiff acted without knowledge of the offer. Henthorn v. Fraser (a-ii) deals with the lapse of an offer by revocation and holds that revocation is effective only when communicated to the offeree, Weeks v. Tybald (b-i) is cited on general statements addressed to the public, and Coffee Board v. CCT (d-iii) concerns implied contractual assent.

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic