Match List I with List II List IList II A. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. 1. Offers at large B.…
In Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co., the advertisement was held an offer to the world at large; in Fisher v. Bell, displaying goods in a shop window was a mere invitation…
Choose your answer
Match List I with List II
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| A. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. | 1. Offers at large |
| B. Fisher v. Bell | 2. Invitation to treat |
| C. Tinn v. Hoffman | 3. Question of price |
| D. Harvey v. Facey | 4. Cross offers |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
In Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co., the advertisement was held an offer to the world at large; in Fisher v. Bell, displaying goods in a shop window was a mere invitation to treat; in Tinn v. Hoffman, identical offers crossing in the post were cross offers forming no contract; and in Harvey v. Facey, a reply stating only the lowest price was not an offer.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision