Match List I with List II LIST I (Name of the case)LIST II(Subject Matter) A. Lalman Shukla v. Gauri…
Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt concerns when communication of a proposal is complete under section 4, Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. is linked with the wagering-agreement…
Choose your answer
Match List I with List II
| LIST I (Name of the case) | LIST II(Subject Matter) |
|---|---|
| A. Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt | I. Section 30, Wagering Agreement |
| B. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. | II. Section 20, Mistakes of Fact |
| C. Hadley v. Baxendale | III. Section 4, Communication when complete |
| D. Phillips v. Brooks | IV. Section 73, Breach of Contract |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt concerns when communication of a proposal is complete under section 4, Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. is linked with the wagering-agreement provision in section 30, Hadley v. Baxendale concerns damages for breach of contract under section 73, and Phillips v. Brooks concerns mistake of fact under section 20, giving "A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II".
Practice for these exams
-
UGC NET Law
See pack details on LawMint.net -
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision