Match List I with List II (Legal terms and their definitions): LIST ILIST II A. Rose and Frank Co. vs.…
Rose and Frank concerns intention to create legal relations, Harris v. Nickerson holds an auction advertisement is only an invitation to offer, Olley v. Marlborough Court…
Choose your answer
Match List I with List II (Legal terms and their definitions):
| LIST I | LIST II |
|---|---|
| A. Rose and Frank Co. vs. Crompton and Brothers Ltd. | I. Standard form of contract |
| B. Harris vs. Nickerson | II. Intention to create legal relations |
| C. Olley vs. Marlborough Court Ltd. | III. Acceptance must be communicated by the acceptor |
| D. Powell vs. Lee | IV. Invitation to offer |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
Rose and Frank concerns intention to create legal relations, Harris v. Nickerson holds an auction advertisement is only an invitation to offer, Olley v. Marlborough Court deals with standard form contracts and notice of terms, and Powell v. Lee establishes that acceptance must be communicated by or with the authority of the acceptor. The correct matching is therefore "A-II, B-IV, C-I, D-III".
Practice for these exams
-
UGC NET Law
See pack details on LawMint.net -
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision