Match List-I and List-II. List-I (Breach of Contract)List-II (Landmark Decision) P. Anticipatory Breach…
The matching is P-2, Q-1, R-4, S-3. Hochster v. De La Tour concerns anticipatory breach, and Hadley v. Baxendale concerns remoteness of contractual damages. Simpson v.…
Choose your answer
Match List-I and List-II.
| List-I (Breach of Contract) | List-II (Landmark Decision) |
|---|---|
| P. Anticipatory Breach of Contract | 1. Hadley v. Baxendale |
| Q. Remoteness of Damages | 2. Hochster v. De La Tour |
| R. Special circumstances with knowledge of Contract Breaker | 3. Anglia Television Ltd. v. Reed |
| S. Pre-contract Expenditure | 4. Simpson v. London & North Western Railway Co. |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer D
The matching is P-2, Q-1, R-4, S-3. Hochster v. De La Tour concerns anticipatory breach, and Hadley v. Baxendale concerns remoteness of contractual damages. Simpson v. London & North Western Railway Co. concerns loss arising from known special circumstances, while Anglia Television Ltd. v. Reed concerns wasted expenditure incurred before the contract.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
JKSET Law
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision