In which Supreme Court judgment in 2002, concerning the then MRTP Act, was competition law described as…
Haridas Exports v. All India Float Glass Manufacturers Association discussed the effects doctrine and competition law’s response to cross-border restrictive practices. Under…
Choose your answer
In which Supreme Court judgment in 2002, concerning the then MRTP Act, was competition law described as a mechanism to counter cross-border economic terrorism, with jurisdiction over restrictive trade practices whose effects are felt in India?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
Haridas Exports v. All India Float Glass Manufacturers Association discussed the effects doctrine and competition law’s response to cross-border restrictive practices. Under current law, section 32 of the Competition Act, 2002 empowers the Commission to examine specified foreign conduct that has, or is likely to have, an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India.
Practice for these exams
-
GSET Law
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision