In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that the time was essence of contract:
A.K. Lakshmipathy v Rai Saheb Pannalal concerns a sale agreement whose terms made the stipulated payment date important. The Court read the contract and the parties’…
Choose your answer
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that the time was essence of contract:
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
A.K. Lakshmipathy v Rai Saheb Pannalal concerns a sale agreement whose terms made the stipulated payment date important. The Court read the contract and the parties’ evidence together and rejected the argument that time was not of the essence. The lesson is to examine the contractual intention and terms, rather than assume that time can never be essential in a property transaction.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Gauhati High Court Law Clerk
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision