Site navigation

In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that for rebutting statutory presumption under…

In "M.S. Narayana Menon v. State of Kerala" (2006) the Supreme Court held that the accused may rebut the statutory presumptions under ss.118(a) and 139 by relying even on…

Choose your answer

In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that for rebutting statutory presumption under Section 118(a) and 139 of the Act, the evidence adduced on behalf of the complainant could be relied upon?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer D

In "M.S. Narayana Menon v. State of Kerala" (2006) the Supreme Court held that the accused may rebut the statutory presumptions under ss.118(a) and 139 by relying even on the complainant's own evidence, on a preponderance of probabilities.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic