Which one of the following cases is not related to the doctrine of severability?
"A.K. Gopalan V. State of Madras", "R.M.D.C. V. Union of India" and "Kihota Holohan V. Zachithu" applied the doctrine of severability to strike down only the offending part…
Choose your answer
Which one of the following cases is not related to the doctrine of severability?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
"A.K. Gopalan V. State of Madras", "R.M.D.C. V. Union of India" and "Kihota Holohan V. Zachithu" applied the doctrine of severability to strike down only the offending part of a law, whereas "Minerva Mills Ltd. V. Union of India" is chiefly known for the basic structure doctrine and the limits on the amending power under Article 368.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
PU-CET PG LLM
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision