Which of the following was not a part of the conclusion of the 9-Judge Constitution Bench in the…
The majority in Lalta Prasad Vaish held that Parliament cannot use Entry 52 of List I to take control of the intoxicating-liquor industry covered by Entry 8 of List II. The…
Choose your answer
Which of the following was not a part of the conclusion of the 9-Judge Constitution Bench in the decision of State of Uttar Pradesh v. Lalta Prasad Vaish,
2024 INSC 812?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
The majority in Lalta Prasad Vaish held that Parliament cannot use Entry 52 of List I to take control of the intoxicating-liquor industry covered by Entry 8 of List II. The statement saying it may legislate notwithstanding that State entry reverses the conclusion. The majority included denatured spirit within the State field, overruled Synthetics and Chemicals in the terms of its judgment, and found reconsideration of Tika Ramji's industry interpretation unnecessary for the reference.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision