Site navigation

Which of the following correctly portray the doctrine of promissory estoppel? 1. The doctrine was…

Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills confirms that a clear promise intended to affect legal relations may bind the government when the promisee acts on it and alters position.…

Choose your answer

Which of the following correctly portray the doctrine of promissory estoppel?
1. The doctrine was firmly established in Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (1979).
2. It applies where the promisee has, acting in reliance on the promise, altered his position.
3. There is no estoppel against the government in its exercise of legislative, sovereign or executive powers.
4. To invoke the doctrine against the government, the petitioner need not show any detriment or damage suffered by acting on the promise.
Select the correct answer from the codes given in the options.

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer B

Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills confirms that a clear promise intended to affect legal relations may bind the government when the promisee acts on it and alters position. Separate proof of loss is unnecessary. The doctrine cannot override legislation or compel action beyond lawful authority. Courts also weigh overriding public interest and whether enforcement would be equitable.

Option feedback

Option A

Statement 3 is too broad because the doctrine can apply to promises made within executive authority.

Option B

Statements 1, 2 and 4 correctly describe the doctrine. Reliance and alteration of position are required even though separate proof of loss is unnecessary.

Option C

Statement 2 is correct. The categorical denial of estoppel against executive action in statement 3 is too broad.

Option D

Statement 1 is correct. A government promise made within executive authority may be subject to estoppel, so statement 3 is too broad.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic