Under the rule in Mohd. Arif v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India, what is the prescribed bench size…
Mohd. Arif prescribed a three-judge bench for the open-court hearing of a death-sentence review. The composition of the bench that laid down this rule is separate from the…
Choose your answer
Under the rule in Mohd. Arif v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India, what is the prescribed bench size for an open-court review of a death sentence in the Supreme Court?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
Mohd. Arif prescribed a three-judge bench for the open-court hearing of a death-sentence review.
The composition of the bench that laid down this rule is separate from the composition it prescribed for reviews.
Option feedback
Option A
The majority prescribed a three-judge open-court review.
Option B
The general two-judge minimum does not supply the special death-sentence review bench.
Option C
The decision did not prescribe four judges.
Option D
A five-judge bench decided Mohd. Arif itself. The rule it laid down calls for a three-judge review.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Himachal Pradesh Judicial Services
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision