Match the items of List I (name of case) with the items of List II (ground of judicial review) and…
Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation developed legitimate expectation, Institute of Law, Chandigarh v. Neeraj Sharma public accountability, the CCSU (GCHQ)…
Choose your answer
Match the items of List I (name of case) with the items of List II (ground of judicial review) and choose the correct answer from the code given below.
| List I (Name of case) | List II (Ground of judicial review) |
|---|---|
| (a) Union of India vs Hindustan Development Corporation | (i) Extraneous consideration |
| (b) Institute of Law, Chandigarh vs Neeraj Sharma | (ii) Legitimate expectations |
| (c) Council of Civil Services Union vs Minister for The Civil Service | (iii) Public accountability |
| (d) Centre for PIL vs Union of India | (iv) Proportionality |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation developed legitimate expectation, Institute of Law, Chandigarh v. Neeraj Sharma public accountability, the CCSU (GCHQ) case proportionality, and Centre for PIL v. Union of India the ground of extraneous consideration, giving "(a)-(ii), (b)-(iii), (c)-(iv), (d)-(i)".
Practice for these exams
-
UGC NET Law
See pack details on LawMint.net -
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision