Site navigation

Match the following: List I (Case)List II (Principle) i. Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachilhu [1992 SCR (1) 686] 1. Challenge to illegality of Legislative Proceedings ii. Basheshar Nath v. IT Commissioner…

Question and options

Match the following:
List I (Case)List II (Principle)
i. Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachilhu [1992 SCR (1) 686]1. Challenge to illegality of Legislative Proceedings
ii. Basheshar Nath v. IT Commissioner [1959 AIR 149]2. Judicial Review as basic structure of the Constitution
iii. Re Keshav Singh [AIR 1965 SC 745]3. No person can waive her/his Fundamental Rights
iv. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India [1997 (2) SCR 1186]4. Judicial Review of Speaker’s order under Anti-Defection law
  1. i-4, ii-3, iii-1, iv-2
  2. i-1, ii-3, iii-2, iv-4
  3. i-3, ii-2, iii-4, iv-1
  4. i-2, ii-1, iii-4, iv-3

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: A - i-4, ii-3, iii-1, iv-2
Kihoto Hollohan - judicial review of Speaker's order under the anti-defection law (4); Basheshar Nath - fundamental rights cannot be waived (3); Re Keshav Singh - legislative privileges/challenge to legislative proceedings (1); L. Chandra Kumar - judicial review is part of basic structure (2).

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

More solved explanations in Constitutional interpretation & doctrines