Site navigation

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that provisions of law seeking to…

In "N. Padmamma v. S. Ramakrishna Reddy, (2008)." the Supreme Court held that a law seeking to divest a person of the right under Art. 300A must be strictly construed.

Choose your answer

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that provisions of law seeking to divest the right provided under Article 300A of the Constitution of India must be strictly construed?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer A

In "N. Padmamma v. S. Ramakrishna Reddy, (2008)." the Supreme Court held that a law seeking to divest a person of the right under Art. 300A must be strictly construed.

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic