In the historical use of the Hicklin test to assess obscenity in India, which ground under Article…
The Hicklin test was historically used to assess obscenity, which concerns decency or morality under Article 19(2). In Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal (2014), the…
Choose your answer
In the historical use of the Hicklin test to assess obscenity in India, which ground under Article 19(2) of the Constitution was relevant?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
The Hicklin test was historically used to assess obscenity, which concerns decency or morality under Article 19(2). In Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal (2014), the Supreme Court adopted a contemporary community-standards approach.
Option feedback
Option A
The Hicklin test was historically used to assess obscenity, which is associated with the ground of decency or morality.
Option B
Defamation is a separate Article 19(2) ground and does not use the Hicklin obscenity test.
Option C
Sovereignty and integrity of India is a separate Article 19(2) ground unrelated to that obscenity test.
Option D
The relevant ground is decency or morality.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision