Site navigation

In Secundrabad Club v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2023), how did the Supreme Court qualify its…

Paragraph 20 ties the binding effect to points raised and decided. The surrounding discussion directs readers to the judgment’s reasoning and context.

Choose your answer

In Secundrabad Club v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2023), how did the Supreme Court qualify its discussion of when its obiter observations bind lower courts under Article 141?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer B

Paragraph 20 ties the binding effect to points raised and decided. The surrounding discussion directs readers to the judgment’s reasoning and context.

Option feedback

Option A

The Court tied the force of an observation to the points raised and decided. An issue that never arose falls outside that description.

Option B

Paragraph 20 ties the binding effect to points raised and decided. The surrounding discussion directs readers to the judgment’s reasoning and context.

Option C

The Court distinguished a case-specific order from the declaration of a rule of law.

Option D

The judgment did not make Constitution Bench membership a condition for binding force under Article 141.

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic