In Faheema Shirin vs State of Kerala case, the court held that Right to Access Internet is a __________
Question and options
In Faheema Shirin vs State of Kerala case, the court held that Right to Access Internet is a __________
- Private Right
- Basic Right
- Public Right
- Fundamental Right
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D - Fundamental Right
In Faheema Shirin v. State of Kerala (2019) the Kerala High Court held that the right to access the Internet is part of the right to education and privacy under Article 21, making it a fundamental right.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUSAT CAT Five-Year LL.B.
-
CUSAT CAT M.Sc. Bioethics
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Right to freedom
- Assertion (A) - An accused person cannot be compelled to be witness against himself. Reason (R) - An accused person cannot be compelled to give his thumb impression.
- Right to Personal liberty includes
- In which case the Supreme Court of India held that polygraphy test conducted under compulsion is violative of Article 20(3) of the Constitution ?
- Which Supreme Court decision in 2016 upheld the constitutional validity of sections 499 and 500 of the former Indian Penal Code, 1860?
- In the case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950), the Supreme Court of India decided that the expression "procedure established by law" in Article 21 of the…