Site navigation

In which case did the Supreme Court, in a patent dispute, direct adherence to the CPC rule requiring the hearing to continue day to day while witnesses in attendance remain to be examined?

Question and options

In which case did the Supreme Court, in a patent dispute, direct adherence to the CPC rule requiring the hearing to continue day to day while witnesses in attendance remain to be examined?

  1. M. V. Shastry v. Gopalkrishna Bhat

  2. Rama Narang v. Ramesh Narang

  3. Lachhman Dass v. Jagat Ram

  4. Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motor Company Ltd.

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: D - Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motor Company Ltd.

In Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motor Company Ltd., the Supreme Court directed strict compliance with Order XVII Rule 1(2), proviso (a), CPC. Once hearing begins, it continues day to day until all witnesses in attendance are examined, unless the court records exceptional reasons for adjournment beyond the following day.

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

More solved explanations in CPC.07 Issues, witnesses, hearing & adjournments