Site navigation

For an ordinary suit to recover a debt, consider expiry of its prescribed limitation period under…

For an ordinary debt suit, expiry of limitation bars the judicial remedy while the underlying debt survives. This is a procedural limitation rather than creation of a new…

Choose your answer

For an ordinary suit to recover a debt, consider expiry of its prescribed limitation period under Section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Exclude acquisition by prescription and suits for possession of property under Sections 25 and 27. Mark the incorrect statement.

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer D

For an ordinary debt suit, expiry of limitation bars the judicial remedy while the underlying debt survives. This is a procedural limitation rather than creation of a new substantive property right. The question expressly excludes prescription and extinguishment associated with suits for possession of property.

Practice for these exams

  • Jammu & Kashmir Judicial Services

  • CUET PG Law (LL.M.)

    Subject revision

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic