Consider the following statements under the Limitation Act, 1963: I. Nothing shall be deemed to be done in good faith which is not done with due care and attention. II. The word Plaintiff includes…
Question and options
Consider the following statements under the Limitation Act, 1963:
I. Nothing shall be deemed to be done in good faith which is not done with due care and attention.
II. The word Plaintiff includes also any person from or through whom the plaintiff derives his right to sue.
I. Nothing shall be deemed to be done in good faith which is not done with due care and attention.
II. The word Plaintiff includes also any person from or through whom the plaintiff derives his right to sue.
- Statement I only is true
- Statement II only is true
- Both statements are true
- Both statements are false
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C - Both statements are true
Both are definitions in s.2 of the Limitation Act, 1963: s.2(h) provides that nothing is deemed done in good faith without due care and attention, and s.2(i) defines 'plaintiff' as including any person from or through whom a plaintiff derives his right to sue. So both statements are true.
Practice for these exams
-
CUSAT CAT LLM
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Preliminary & bar of limitation
- Under Section 1(3), when does the Limitation Act, 1963 come into force?
- Subject to sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act, 1963, how must a court apply section 3 when a proceeding is filed after the prescribed period and limitation has…
- Under which section of the Limitation Act, 1963 is "period of limitation" defined?
- How does section 2(j) of the Limitation Act, 1963 define the ‘prescribed period’?
- Consider the following statements with respect to the Limitation Act, 1963:- (i) A 'tort' is always a civil wrong. (ii) A "promissory note" includes an instrument…